Technical Manager

#79-1/12/09-Trust Your Experiences


Trust Your Experiences
“How do you recognize good management advice?”
Posted by Steven Cerri on Monday, January 12, 2009

Hello everyone!

“Who do you trust and what is the truth in management?”

This last week I was reading some of the blogs on the people skills necessary for successful management. One blog, in particular, caught my eye.  It had to do with “behaviors” that are necessary for a good manager.

Some of the behaviors put forth by the author included things like these soft skills:

1. When you are managing, never show your emotions.
2. When you are managing, never raise your voice.  Always have a calm voice.  If you get frustrated you can scream into a pillow in your office.
3. Always have a smile on your face.
4. Walk around and talk to your direct reports.  Ask them how they are doing and give them suggestions on how they can do their job better.

These were just a few of the “best practices” that this author put forward regarding how to behave if you want to be a good manager.  The author had been a manager for five years and wanted to share what he had learned.

Fair enough.

What I find interesting is this; “How is a new manager who is reading this information, to use and apply these suggestions and to know which suggestions are true and which are false?

But wait… the truth!

How do you know that the information put forth is accurate?  Is there any way that you might know if 5 years as manager is enough to give authoritative knowledge?  Is the equivalent of two years of engineering school enough to allow someone to sign off on the design of a bridge or analyze the orbital velocity requirements for rendezvous with the International Space Station?

Actually there is a way to know.

In our own personal experience we know what works for management and what doesn’t.  In our own personal experience we have a sense of what good managers do and what bad managers do or don’t do.

And yet, many, many people choose to discount their own personal experience in order to follow the “leader”.  They discount what they know in their gut to be true, because the “leader” says that something else is true, instead.  And yet, we know it’s not.

So lets take some of those “gems” put forth on the blog post and see if they align with our personal experience.

When you are managing, never show your emotions.
My experience:  Not true.

It’s not a question of showing emotions, its a question of what emotions you do show and the degree to which you do so.  It’s not very useful to be a tyrant and yell at people and insult them in public.  But it’s certainly useful to show compassion, and determination, and even sternness, and maybe levity, politeness, and at times frustration, disappointment, and even anger.  It’s impossible to not show emotions.  The key is to show the right ones and at the appropriate level.  (I could write a book on this.)

When you are managing, never raise your voice.  Always have a calm voice.  If you get frustrated you can scream into a pillow in your office.
My experience: Half true, half not true.

Never raise your voice… well it depends.  I have had direct reports with whom I would never raise my voice.  And I’ve had direct reports with whom a good, hearty, give-and-take, with raised voices and even yelling was the only way to build the rapport and connection that the direct report (and I for that matter) wanted.  To be always calm with this direct report would have actually adversely affected our professional relationship.

And the idea of always having a calm voice… come on.  Have you ever been really upset and in need of help?  So you called a customer service representative and the person at the other end of the line sounded as if they were as calm as could be.  What was your response?

I know that my response has been to be annoyed with them.  They were too calm.  They didn’t understand that my situation was important.

Always being calm is nearly as bad as always yelling, almost.

And yes, if you are going to go off on someone… go scream into a pillow until you calm down.

Always have smile on your face.
My experience: Not true.

First, have you ever been around someone who always has a smile on their face?  Have you ever thought to yourself, “What are they doing… always with a smile on their face.  It can’t be real.” And often it’s not real.

No one wants to be around a doom and gloom person (except other doom and gloom people) but it’s important to be authentic and yet appropriate.

So rules like “always have a smile on your face” are just not useful.  A better suggestion is to always be appropriate and effective in any given situation so that you and the team can achieve your/their desired outcome.  (This is a topic for another book).

Now the important point about my comments is this; the suggestions put in the blog I read were a decent attempt to quantify behaviors that would make a manager a good manager.

However, management is not a simple process.  It is not given to quick and simple rules.  In engineering, F=ma.  The laws of physics are clear, stable, repeatable. Unfortunately or fortunately, management doesn’t have similarly clear, stable, repeatable rules.  The biggest rule in management is “it depends.” The best way to know if what someone is telling you is true, is to match it to your experience.  And if you have no experience in a specific are, then take it “one-step-at-a-time”.

With respect to every suggested soft skill behavior I listed from the blog, we all have personal experiences that contradict what was suggested.

We all know of times when emotion displayed by our managers was just what we wanted to see, hear, and experience.  Therefore, when to display what emotion is context dependent.  It depends.

We all have experiences when we didn’t want our managers to display a smile.  We want to be able to “read” our managers by hearing the tone of their voice.  We don’t want them to be smiling when they are laying people off.  Once again, it depends.

And, there are times when we certainly don’t want our managers to come around talking to us, looking over our shoulders and giving us suggestions about how we can do things better.  There are times when we will welcome the advice and other times when we’ll probably consider it micromanagement.  So once again it depends.

The bottom line is...
So the bottom line is this.  Management, leadership, even contributing your maximum to your organization is not something you learn in five years of on-the-job training.  (How long was the intense training your received for your engineering degree?)

It’s also not something you learn from a simple set of rules. 

In basic terms…


Engineering is about knowledge; Management is about judgment. 

Engineering is about rules; Management is about context.

Engineering is an application of knowledge in search of certainty; Management is the application of judgment in search of an outcome.


Very different worlds.

Be well,

Steven Cerri


By the way.  If you’d like to leave a comment, and I’d sure be interested if you did, I’ve changed the comments software.  Only your comment and your name will show up at the end of the comment.  I have modified the software so that your email address will not show up anywhere.

“What would it be like to be as successful with people as you are with your technology?” Steven trains, coaches, and facilitates engineers and technical managers to BE the answer to that question.  More information can be found at the:http://stevencerri.com/index.php/Home/index/

Copyright©2008 STCerri International and Steven Cerri.  You are free to pass this information on to others and to reproduce it.  If you reproduce it in whole or part please give attribution to Steven Cerri. Thank you.

Posted by Steven Cerri on 01/12 at 11:15 PM Engineer to Technical ManagerBecoming a managerTechnical ManagerLeadershipEngineering LeadershipManagementEngineering ManagementManagement for engineersInter-Personal People SkillsSoft Skills for engineers • (0) Comments • (0) TrackbacksPermalink

#5-09-25-06:  To Be A Manager


So You Want To Be A Manager

How Does A Technical Person Get Promoted To Manager?
Posted by Steven Cerri on Monday, September 25, 2006

Hello everyone!

If you’re currently a technical professional and you’re thinking about going into management, it’s important that you be aware that your transition to management isn’t going to be an overnight process.  You’re not going to go to bed one night as a technical professional and wake up the next morning as a technical manager.  But you knew that, right?  What you probably didn’t know is that it can be a very slow OR a relatively fast process.  And it most certainly won’t be orderly because your boss or your company probably won’t prepare you well for the transition. 

I’ve seen a lot of technical people get selected for management and so I’m going to tell you one of the likely scenarios you might experience.

First and foremost, most managers, and here I’m speaking of your manager; most managers don’t really understand management as a discipline.  (I know, it sounds like a ridiculous statement, but all I can do is ask you to consider how competent you believe the managers are that you’ve met?  Most of you will say, “not very”.) This is because most managers think that management is a no-brainer, or at the very least, it’s not a very rigorous discipline.  Therefore, if you do your engineering work well, and you seem readily capable of talking to people, your manager will think that because you can do your technical work well you can manage other people doing the same or similar work.

That’s right.  Most technical professionals who do a very good job at their technical work are “assumed” to be competent to manage a team of people doing the same or similar work.  You manager is thinking something like this:  “Well John (or Betty) is a really good engineer.  He really seems to know his stuff when it comes to the technology.  And he seems to be a nice enough person.  He seems to communicate well enough with other people.  Most people like him.  He doesn’t seem to raise his voice or get into verbal disputes. He can probably manage one or two people doing similar work to what he has been doing.  I’ll just give him a simple management task with a few people to manage and see how he works out.”

That’s it.  That’s how you get selected for management.  There is usually no more preparation than that.  As you will probably notice from this scenario, you’ve been selected for a relatively small project.  That’s reasonable.  You’re not going to be selected to be a full-time manager without significant experience.  However, the key here is that you will often be selected for your first management position without being given sufficient training.  You’ll be seen as a good technical person.  You’ll be seen as someone without significant inter-social faults.  You’ll be asked (usually) if you want to be a manager and most of the time the response is “sure”.  And that will be it.

Now once in a while a good technical person is selected to manage a small project and they are given some training in preparation for this new responsibility.  The training will often come in the form of one or more of the following classes:  corporate human resources/personnel policies; project management; budgeting and scheduling; good listening skills.  While these classes regarding the “doing” of management at your company are useful, they are not what you need as a new manager.  Primarily what you need as a new manager is a way to understand how to make the transition from individual contributor, the “doer” part to the motivator, the “doer doing less and motivating others to do”. 

As an individual contributor you got your rewards from the doing.  As a manager, you will get part or all of your rewards from what others are doing.  This is the shift you want to make.  This is what you want to learn about.  This is what will make or break your transition.

I want to point out one more major dilemma in this early stage transition, and that is you will have “one foot” in the management world and “one foot” in the individual contributor world.  That is, you won’t be a full-time manager and you won’t be a full-time individual contributor either.  This is a very difficult situation to be in but unfortunately, we all have to go through it.  There seems to be no other way to get from technical professional to manager.  At some point in the early days of our transition process, we all have to be part-time manager and part-time technical professional.  You will have to “change hats” frequently from manager to individual contributor and back and forth and this will definitely get confusing and it will be a challenge… I can guarantee it.  But frankly, there isn’t any other way.  You won’t have sufficient experience to be a full-time manager so you’ll have to make it a part-time gig.  And about half of you will not succeed. 

You won’t succeed because you never wanted management in the first place.  If you had wanted management you certainly wouldn’t have studied all those years to be a technical professional.  So let’s be clear.  Being a technical professional is generally not a “people oriented” profession.  Technology deals with ideas, laws of physics, machines, equations, and only peripherally, with people. 

Now all of a sudden, because you do your technical work so well, you are going to be asked to focus on “people”.


I take the position, that from the technical professionals’ point of view, management is a new career.  One that you didn’t ask for and one you didn’t prepare for.  And yet, here it is.  It’s going to require preparation and practice.  And it’s going to require more than just knowledge of how to use Microsoft Project, or how to set up budgets and schedules.  It’s going to require an understanding of how to deal with and communicate with and manage people.  It’s going to require a personal understanding of your own motivational forces and an understanding of the motivational forces of others.  This is why the transition to management is such a challenge for many technical professionals. 

It’s a new career.  It can be done.  It can be done smoothly, elegantly, and successfully.  It must be done with a conscious process of choice and an understanding that, for most technical professionals, it’s a second career.


Be well

Steven Cerri


Posted by Steven Cerri on 09/25 at 10:47 AM Engineer to Technical ManagerBecoming a managerTechnical ManagerManagementEngineering ManagementManagement for engineersManagement for technologistsTechnical ManagementInter-Personal People SkillsCommunication for engineersSoft Skills for engineersSoft Skills for Technologists • (0) CommentsPermalink

#4-09/21/06:  Can People Change?


Can People Really Change? (Part 2)

The Answer To The Million Dollar Question.
Posted by Steven Cerri on Thursday, September 21, 2006

Good morning!

I’m now going to answer the question I posed in the previous blog---“Can People Really Change?” In the previous blog I pondered exactly what that question meant. And I’ll now answer it in two ways.  First I’m going to say that if the question is really asking if people can change their personalities, if they can change “who” they are, then my answer is “I don’t know and it really doesn’t matter”.

A manager’s job is not to “change” someone. If that’s the manager’s life mission they should have been a therapist.

Second, a better question to ask is, “Do People Change Their Behavior?” And the answer is absolutely “YES”.

As a manager, your job is to get a specific behavior from people, behaviors that support the goals of the organization, not to change their personality.

People are constantly changing their behaviors to get what they want and a manager’s job is to find a way to get people to behave in such a way that is productive for the team, the company, the project, and the individual.

In fact, that’s exactly why I got the reputation of being a manager who could build high performance teams with people no other managers wanted to work with.  I was able to focus on getting the behavior that I wanted.  And it’s why my coaching programs produce such powerful results (I know that’s blatant self-promotion, but it’s a fact.)

The best way to think of it is this way.  Imagine that each human being is an iceberg floating in the sea of life.  (Sounds poetic doesn’t it?) From our birth through our early years our iceberg has the potential to float pretty high in the water.  A good deal of our potential way of being, our potential personality and the behaviors produced are visible for all the world to see.  We play, we express ourselves, we laugh, we cry according to some internal and innate sense of who we are and who we can be and who we are becoming!  Our behavior is flexible and varied.

Then life occurs and “stuff” gets added on top of our iceberg and more and more of our iceberg gets pushed under the surface of life, invisible to most people.  We “grow up”, we go to college, we become technical professionals and our iceberg gets well defined as a “technical professional’s” iceberg.  Now life just keeps happening and maybe all of a sudden the waters change.  Maybe they get warmer; maybe they get colder; maybe they get rougher; maybe they get calmer.  Whatever new situation arises, it’s a new situation and the question becomes, “What happens to our iceberg?”

Well, we generally attempt to ride in the “new” waters the same way we rode in our “old” waters.  And often that doesn’t work.  So a manager, coach, mentor comes along and starts to interact with us.  All of a sudden things are different.  The person (in this case, the “we”) begins to behave differently. As I said, in my career, my experience is that I can take people who have not been willing to change their behavior and when they find themselves traveling in the waters I manage, they’re different.  What’s unique?  Is it me, is it the other person, or have both of us led to this difference?

I’ve now come to understand what happens not so much as a change process at the core of an individual but as a “potential” for changed behavior and the appearance of that changed behavior in the world.  You see, many people are hiding most of their potential under the waters’ surface, out of view of the world.  If you know how to change the surface “weight” on their iceberg, (i.e., the environment, the communication, their relationship to their world) you can actually get people to “expose” a capability they have always had but that hasn’t been visible, yet.  The capability has always been there and because of fear, or lack of need, or lack of knowledge, it stayed hidden.  The really exquisite manager, or mentor, or coach, can bring this capability to the surface and help the person expose it and all of a sudden it looks like the person has changed when in reality they’ve had the capability all along and all that is different is that the person is behaving differently.  Have they “changed” at the core?  Maybe; maybe not. 

But as a manager, I’m not interested if they’ve changed at their core, I’m most interested in their ability to change their behavior.

Now some people don’t have certain capabilities.  No amount of coaching, managing, or mentoring will bring a behavior to the surface if it’s not under the surface to begin with.  For those people, training and desire are then necessary.  For example, let’s say my manager decided that the company needed a brain surgeon and I should be it.  I’m not a brain surgeon and I haven’t been trained as a brain surgeon.  It’s not a reasonable potential for me, yet.  No amount of coaching, mentoring, or managing is going to make me a brain surgeon by uncovering that hidden capability.  In order for me to be a brain surgeon I have to want it, badly, and I have to be trained in it.  Once trained, I can have that behavior as a potential.

Likewise, if a manager wants an employee to behave differently and the necessary capabilities are not there, such as communication skills, or management skills, or and interpersonal skills, no amount of prodding is going to make it happen.  The direct report will have to want to make those changes and will have to acquire the knowledge and training necessary to have those capabilities.

On the other hand, if your manager wants you to make a presentation to a thousand people, and you already have comfort speaking in front of a few people, but you just haven’t spoken to a thousand people before, then getting you to step up on stage to speak to a thousand people is merely a capability that has been hidden from view.  And in the right circumstances, that behavior will show up.

So I’ve come to believe that I don’t know the answer to the question “Do people change?” What I have concluded is that people have a vast potential that is unexplored, unexposed, and not used in the way they can behave.  A vast potential of how they can become given the opportunity.  And there are two requirements for a behavior to show up.  Number one they have to want it.  A desire to have the new capability and the new behaviors is a necessary but not sufficient requirement.  The second required component is the exquisite mentor, coach, or manager who can create an environment where some of that vast potential of the person can indeed be exposed.  It’s what Peter Drucker meant when he said a manager’s job is to emphasize people’s strengths and make their weaknesses irrelevant.

There you have it.  Like the iceberg, there is much more under these words that goes into their application.  This is the process that I use in my coaching program.  At some point in your career, as a technical professional you’ll be asked to behave not so much as an engineer, scientist, or technologist, but as team leader, a manager, a facilitator, or marketing communicator (or maybe you’ve already been asked).  All or some of these requested behaviors might be potential behaviors that have been hidden but have not yet become available to you.  How do you make the shift?  How do you behave differently and keep yourself intact.  This is where coaching, and judgment come into play.

Be well

Steven Cerri

Posted by Steven Cerri on 09/21 at 09:22 AM Engineer to Technical ManagerBecoming a managerTechnical ManagerManagementEngineering ManagementManagement for engineersManagement for technologistsTechnical ManagementInter-Personal People Skills • (0) CommentsPermalink

Page 1 of 1 pages